EXAMPLE ONE: Search Procedure A systematic review of the literature for behavioral feeding interventions with children that did not include escape extinction or other intrusive interventions was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines (Moher et al., 2009). The PRISMA model entails four tiers: (1) identifying articles, (2) screening articles, (3) assessing eligibility of articles, and (4) the inclusion of articles. The primary researcher conducted the primary database search by evaluating articles on PsychINFO from the years 1980 to 2018. The search terms were: “(food selectivity OR food refusal OR picky eating OR food aversion OR feeding disorders) AND autism NOT escape extinction” and “(food selectivity OR food refusal OR picky eating OR food aversion) NOT escape extinction” and “(food selectivity OR food refusal OR picky eating OR food aversion) AND ‘avoidance/restrictive food intake disorder’ NOT escape extinction.” The PsychINFO search yielded 525 articles. Then the titles and abstracts, of the 525 retrieved articles, were read by the primary researcher. The primary researcher also manually reviewed an additional 85 for articles based upon the articles that were assessed for eligibility. Thus, a total of 610 articles were initially identified. The primary researcher removed 222 duplicates from the two sources of finding potential articles. This left a total of 388 articles to be screened. The primary researcher excluded 289 articles from further review because the study did not examine increased food or 8 REVIEW FEEDING INTERVENTIONS liquid acceptance without the use of escape extinction or intrusive procedures. Therefore, a total of 99 articles remained for the reviewer to evaluate the eligibility criteria for inclusion by reading the full-text of the article. Twenty-one articles were found that met the criteria for inclusion; 78 articles did not meet inclusion criteria. The majority (n=38) of the articles were excluded due to using escape extinction (i.e. nonremoval of the spoon, escape prevention, physical prompt to consume) and nine were removed as the treatment was not specified throughout the article. Further explanation of reasons for exclusion are summarized in Table 1. The PRISMA diagram in Figure 1 indicates the number of reviewed and included articles (Moher et al., 2009).

EXAMPLE ONE:

Search Procedure

A systematic review of the literature for behavioral feeding interventions with children that did not include escape

extinction or other intrusive interventions was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines (Moher et al., 2009).

The PRISMA model entails four tiers: (1) identifying articles, (2) screening articles, (3) assessing eligibility of articles, and

(4) the inclusion of articles.

The primary researcher conducted the primary database search by evaluating articles on PsychINFO from the

years 1980 to 2018. The search terms were: “(food selectivity OR food refusal OR picky eating OR food aversion OR

feeding disorders) AND autism NOT escape extinction” and “(food selectivity OR food refusal OR picky eating OR food

aversion) NOT escape extinction” and “(food selectivity OR food refusal OR picky eating OR food aversion) AND

‘avoidance/restrictive food intake disorder’ NOT escape extinction.” The PsychINFO search yielded 525 articles. Then the

titles and abstracts, of the 525 retrieved articles, were read by the primary researcher. The primary researcher also

manually reviewed an additional 85 for articles based upon the articles that were assessed for eligibility. Thus, a total of

610 articles were initially identified. The primary researcher removed 222 duplicates from the two sources of finding

potential articles. This left a total of 388 articles to be screened. The primary researcher excluded 289 articles from further

review because the study did not examine increased food or 8 REVIEW FEEDING INTERVENTIONS liquid acceptance

without the use of escape extinction or intrusive procedures. Therefore, a total of 99 articles remained for the reviewer to

evaluate the eligibility criteria for inclusion by reading the full-text of the article.

Twenty-one articles were found that met the criteria for inclusion; 78 articles did not meet inclusion criteria. The

majority (n=38) of the articles were excluded due to using escape extinction (i.e. nonremoval of the spoon, escape

prevention, physical prompt to consume) and nine were removed as the treatment was not specified throughout the

article. Further explanation of reasons for exclusion are summarized in Table 1. The PRISMA diagram in Figure 1

indicates the number of reviewed and included articles (Moher et al., 2009).

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

You will develop a substantive understanding of the six components of reading as a process by creating a Reading Development Paper. In this assignment, you

You will develop a substantive understanding of the six components of reading as a process by creating a Reading Development Paper. In this assignment, you will identify, define, and explain each of the following six reading components: (comprehension, oral language, phonological awareness, phonics, fluency, and vocabulary) and their relevance to

Assessment Description ACA and ASCA address the significance of self-care, advocacy, and human flourishing for school counselors and mental health

Assessment Description ACA and ASCA address the significance of self-care, advocacy, and human flourishing for school counselors and mental health clinicians. For this assignment, integrate the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to develop an infographic to address the following in 300-500 words. Self-Care After reading the introduction of Section C

Assessment Description The purpose of this assignment is to identify and apply the five ethical principles for ethical decision-making, client rights, and

Assessment Description The purpose of this assignment is to identify and apply the five ethical principles for ethical decision-making, client rights, and understanding of telehealth. Access and review the “Counselor Ethics and Responsibilities Assignment Guidelines.” Complete the paper according to the assignment guidelines. Include at least six scholarly resources in